Running a functional medicine practice today means juggling more than patient care. You’re navigating complex cases, coordinating with labs, tracking protocols, and trying to keep the patient experience front and center. But if your electronic medical record (EMR) system is clunky, generic, or not built for your needs, it can feel like you’re working against your own tools instead of with them.
As the field continues to grow, finding an EMR that aligns with your practice model isn’t just a nice-to-have. It’s essential. This article evaluates the best EMRs for functional medicine practices in 2025 based on usability, lab integration, customization, and patient engagement.
Whole person care is the future.
Fullscript puts it within reach.
healthcare is delivered.
Functional Medicine Practice Needs in an EMR
Functional medicine practices operate with very different demands than conventional primary care, and those differences should be reflected in the tools providers use every day. A well-suited EMR must go beyond basic scheduling and charting to support a model rooted in systems biology, long-term care, and individualized protocols.
Unique Workflow Requirements
Functional medicine clinicians often manage chronic and complex conditions that require tracking over months or even years. This calls for EMRs that support:
- Long-term treatment planning with timeline tracking
- Root-cause investigation tools to map contributing factors
- Detailed documentation for nutrition, sleep, stress, and environmental exposures
- Multi-system tracking that allows for layered, interconnected insights
Generic EMRs built for acute care don’t typically support these types of workflows, leading to excessive workarounds and documentation fatigue.
Custom Templates and Protocol Libraries
Functional medicine relies heavily on structured protocols, such as detox support, IV therapy, hormone balancing, and elimination diets. EMRs with customizable templates allow providers to standardize these protocols while tailoring them to individual needs. This saves time, enhances documentation, and improves care continuity.
Integrated Lab Ordering and Tracking
Ordering from specialty labs is routine in functional medicine. EMRs that integrate with labs like Genova, DUTCH, and Mosaic streamline this process. With HL7 or API connections, results flow directly into the EMR, making it easier to track trends and link lab data to clinical findings.
Patient-Centered Features
Strong engagement tools help patients stay involved in their care. Secure messaging, shared goal-setting, and lifestyle tracking support communication between visits. When patients can access their notes and plans, they’re more likely to follow through and stay on track.
Key Evaluation Criteria for Functional EMRs
Choosing an EMR is more than just picking a software tool—it’s selecting a long-term partner in your practice’s daily operations and growth. For functional medicine providers, the right system needs to reflect both the complexity of patient care and the logistics of running a business. Evaluating EMRs through the lens of clinical and operational fit is essential.
Customization and Specialty Tools
Functional medicine EMRs must offer flexibility to support complex care plans. Key tools include customizable SOAP note templates, personalized intake forms, and protocol builders for common treatments like detox or hormone balancing. These features streamline documentation while preserving the ability to individualize care.
Lab Integration
Effective lab integration is essential for root-cause analysis. Look for EMRs with HL7 or API connections that support both ordering and receiving results. Auto-mapping labs into charts with trend tracking and flagging saves time and makes lab data easier to interpret in context.
Telehealth and Mobility
Virtual care is common in functional medicine, especially for practices spanning multiple regions. EMRs should support secure video consults, mobile access for both providers and patients, and flexible scheduling that accounts for different time zones. These features make care more accessible and efficient.
Billing and Practice Management
Your EMR should match your billing model, whether DPC or insurance-based. Key features include subscription billing tools, claims processing, and inventory management for supplements. These tools help reduce administrative burden and support financial sustainability.
Support and Onboarding
Reliable support is critical during EMR setup and daily use. Choose systems that offer live support, one-on-one onboarding, data migration help, and easy-to-follow documentation. These services ensure smoother transitions and better long-term usability.
Feature Matrix Comparison
A feature matrix makes it easier to compare multiple EMRs side-by-side. This can help identify trade-offs or strengths in specific areas. Key comparison categories should include:
- Customization capabilities (SOAP notes, forms, protocols)
- Lab integration depth and supported partners
- Patient portal functionality
- Billing tools (insurance, DPC, hybrid)
- Supplement and inventory management
- Telehealth features
- Customer support quality
- Mobile usability for providers and patients
By assessing platforms against these functional medicine-specific criteria, practices can better align their clinical and operational goals with the right technology solution.
Comparison of Top Functional Medicine EMRs in 2025
With so many EMR platforms available in 2025, choosing the right one for a functional medicine practice requires more than a surface-level comparison. Below is a breakdown of top EMRs, each evaluated on key features relevant to integrative workflows, such as lab integration, telehealth, patient engagement tools, and billing flexibility.
Practice Better
Ideal for solo or small integrative practices, Practice Better offers a well-rounded platform with built-in telehealth, custom protocols, and a secure patient portal. It supports HIPAA compliance, patient education, and collaborative goal tracking.
Pricing ranges from $25 to $145 per month. The main drawbacks include limited real-time support and the effort needed to customize templates.
Cerbo
Cerbo suits mid-sized practices needing flexibility in documentation and lab integration. It features customizable charting, broad lab and pharmacy connections, and is built for multi-provider environments without contract lock-in. Pricing includes a $1,195 setup fee and $145–$268 monthly.
The system has a steep learning curve, and onboarding may be time-intensive.
Healthie
Healthie is a strong fit for wellness practices focused on coaching and data tracking. It includes analytics, wearable integrations, a mobile app, and client communication tools. Pricing varies from free to over $149 per month. However, its broad features may be overwhelming for smaller or simpler practices.
OptiMantra
Designed for multidisciplinary clinics, OptiMantra supports deep customization and Fullscript integration, and comprehensive telehealth. Plans start at $99 per month, with discounts for NPs and PAs. While powerful, its setup can be complex and initially overwhelming.
Power2Practice
Power2Practice is tailored for functional medicine clinics, featuring advanced lab and supplement integration and a functional-first design. It’s endorsed by A4M and connects to nutraceutical platforms. Pricing is by quote only. Users may encounter a steeper learning curve and less transparent pricing.
DocVilla
Best suited for DPC and supplement-heavy practices, DocVilla includes DPC billing, compound eRx, and integrations with Fullscript and HL7 labs. Pricing is modular based on features. While comprehensive, it may be overbuilt for simpler or smaller operations.
ChARM EHR
ChARM is a budget-friendly option for solo and small practices. It offers HIPAA-compliant telehealth, scheduling, and core EMR functions in a cloud-based format. Pricing is tiered and accessible. However, it may not be robust enough for larger or more complex practices.
JaneApp
JaneApp provides clean tools for scheduling, billing, and charting, ideal for providers who prioritize simplicity. It offers subscription-based pricing with flexible plans. While streamlined, its customization options may fall short for specialized functional protocols.
EMR Selection Based on Practice Size
Choosing the right EMR often comes down to practice size and workflow complexity. A solo provider’s needs look very different from those of a multi-provider clinic, and trying to make one-size-fits-all systems work can lead to inefficiency and frustration. Here’s how to align EMR selection with practice size.
Solo Providers
For individual providers, affordability and ease of use are often top priorities. The ideal EMR should streamline documentation and patient communication without being overly complex or expensive. Strong options include:
- Practice Better: Offers a low barrier to entry, built-in telehealth, and customizable protocols for solo integrative providers.
- ChARM EHR: Budget-friendly with core functionality that includes scheduling, telehealth, and basic documentation.
These systems prioritize usability and affordability while still supporting key needs like secure messaging and treatment tracking.
Small to Medium Practices
Growing practices need systems that scale with them, offering both collaborative features and more robust workflow support. EMRs in this category should provide multi-user access and permissions, enhanced customization for SOAP notes and protocols, and lab and supplement integrations.
Top fits include:
- Cerbo: Known for flexibility and extensive lab support, ideal for practices managing complex cases across a small team.
- Healthie: Great for practices incorporating lifestyle coaching, with business analytics and wearable integration.
- OptiMantra: Offers depth in specialty workflows with the scalability needed as teams expand.
Large Clinics and Multi-Provider Practices
Larger organizations require EMRs that can manage multiple providers, extensive charting, diverse patient populations, and administrative complexity. Important features include role-based access control, robust billing and complex scheduling and documentation needs
Recommended platforms:
- Power2Practice: Built specifically for functional and integrative medicine clinics, with advanced supplement and lab integration.
- DocVilla: Strong DPC and billing tools, customizable modules, and scalable infrastructure.
Specialty-Specific Functionalities
Functional medicine practices require features that go well beyond standard EMR capabilities. Specialty-specific tools support the nuanced therapies, diagnostics, and long-term monitoring that are central to this approach.
Support for Complementary Therapies
Functional and integrative practices often incorporate therapies not traditionally found in conventional settings. A suitable EMR should accommodate documentation for:
- Acupuncture and bodywork sessions, including point charts and treatment outcomes
- Herbal medicine protocols, with dosage instructions and sourcing notes
- Nutrition counseling, including macronutrient planning and elimination diet tracking
Platforms like Practice Better and OptiMantra excel in this area with built-in support for non-pharmacologic treatment plans and custom protocol libraries.
Custom Lab Panel Management
Unlike conventional medicine, functional providers often order comprehensive, tailored lab panels. Key features to look for include:
- Creation of custom panels combining tests from multiple sources
- Direct ordering and tracking through integrations with Genova, DUTCH, and Mosaic
- Auto-population of results into charts with trend tracking
Systems like Cerbo and DocVilla provide deeper control over lab configuration and integration, streamlining both ordering and result analysis.
Long-Term Care and Progress Tracking
Chronic case management demands tools that support continuity and visual insights. Ideal EMRs include:
- Progress charts for labs, symptoms, or lifestyle metrics
- Goal tracking modules to monitor patient-defined objectives
- Timelines for interventions and symptom resolution
These tools support the long-view model of functional medicine and facilitate shared decision-making. Healthie and Practice Better stand out with their user-friendly visualization tools.
Dietary and Lifestyle Tracking
Capturing daily behaviors is essential for understanding patient progress. Look for features that allow:
- Logging of food intake, bowel movements, mood, sleep, and physical activity
- HRV and stress level tracking from compatible devices
- Provider access to trends over time
This functionality is especially valuable in nutrition-forward practices or when managing autoimmune, metabolic, or GI concerns.
Integration with Wearables
Integrating real-time health data supports a more complete clinical picture. Leading platforms offer:
- Auto-sync with Oura Ring, Fitbit, and Apple Health
- Data display within the patient chart or dashboard
- Customizable metrics to align with treatment goals
Healthie offers robust wearable integration, especially for practices emphasizing lifestyle and behavior change.
Integration with Supplement Dispensaries
Supplement management is another critical aspect of functional care that standard EMRs often overlook. The right integrations streamline both prescribing and fulfillment.
Fullscript Integration
Many functional EMRs now offer direct integration with professional-grade dispensaries. Key benefits include:
- In-EMR access to Fullscript catalogs
- Inventory and order tracking directly within patient records
Platforms like OptiMantra, DocVilla, and Power2Practice offer seamless workflows that reduce redundant documentation and improve provider efficiency.
Adherence Monitoring
Some advanced EMRs take supplement management further with features such as:
- Adherence tracking via refill reminders or self-reported usage
- Notifications for missed refills or expired recommendations
These features support both therapeutic consistency and patient accountability while streamlining communication between provider and patient.
Frequently Asked Questions (FAQs)
Choosing an EMR for a functional medicine practice can raise a lot of practical questions, especially with so many features and platforms to consider. Here are answers to some of the most common questions clinicians ask when evaluating systems.
What EMRs support bidirectional lab integration with Genova and DUTCH?
Cerbo, OptiMantra, and DocVilla offer strong lab integrations, including bidirectional support with Genova Diagnostics and DUTCH. These connections streamline both ordering and result tracking.
Which functional medicine EMRs offer customized treatment protocols and IV tracking?
Practice Better, Cerbo, and Power2Practice all support custom treatment protocols. Power2Practice and DocVilla are particularly strong for IV therapy tracking and documentation.
Are there EMRs that support both insurance billing and Direct Primary Care models?
DocVilla and Cerbo support hybrid billing models, making them suitable for practices that offer both DPC and insurance-based services.
What are the setup times and support options for top EMRs?
Practice Better offers a quicker setup for smaller practices but has limited live support. Cerbo and OptiMantra require more onboarding time but provide detailed documentation and optional one-on-one training.
Which systems best support supplement management with Fullscript?
Power2Practice, DocVilla, and OptiMantra offer integrated Fullscript features, including protocol creation, inventory linking, and order tracking.
Which EMRs offer the best functionality for solo or small practice providers?
Practice Better and ChARM EHR provide cost-effective and user-friendly solutions for solo or small group providers.
What are the most scalable EMRs for clinics expecting growth?
Cerbo and OptiMantra are highly scalable and adaptable for practices planning to expand. Healthie also scales well, especially for wellness-focused growth.
Do any EMRs integrate with wearable devices for HRV and sleep tracking?
Healthie leads in wearable integration, supporting data from Apple Health, Fitbit, and Oura Ring, with automatic syncing into client records.
What’s the best EMR under $100/month for a new solo provider?
Practice Better and ChARM EHR are both excellent options under $100/month, offering essential features for functional care without overwhelming complexity.
Key Takeaways
- Functional medicine practices need EMRs that support long-term, individualized care with tools for tracking complex conditions, root-cause analysis, and lifestyle factors.
- The most effective EMRs for these practices offer customizable protocols, deep lab integrations (e.g., DUTCH, Genova), patient engagement tools, and supplement management features.
- EMR selection should match practice size and complexity—Practice Better and ChARM suit solo providers, while Cerbo, OptiMantra, and Power2Practice scale better for larger clinics.
- Features like wearable integration, adherence monitoring, and goal tracking are especially valuable for managing chronic conditions and improving patient adherence.
- Systems like DocVilla, Power2Practice, and Healthie stand out for combining robust clinical tools with billing, telehealth, and lifestyle tracking to meet the unique needs of functional medicine.
Disclaimer:
This article is intended for educational purposes only and does not constitute medical, legal, or technology procurement advice. References to specific EMR platforms are informational and do not imply endorsement. Healthcare professionals should conduct independent evaluations and consult appropriate experts before selecting or implementing any electronic medical record system.
Whole person care is the future.
Fullscript puts it within reach.
healthcare is delivered.
References
-
- Cao, T., Chen, Z., & Nakayama, M. (2024). Enhancing the Functionalities of Personal Health Record Systems: Empirical Study Based on the HL7 Personal Health Record System Functional Model Release 1. JMIR Medical Informatics, 12, e56735–e56735. https://doi.org/10.2196/56735
- Fellner, J., Dugowson, C., Liebovitz, D., Fletcher, G., & Payne, T. (2012). Use of more than one electronic medical record system within a single health care organization. Applied Clinical Informatics, 03(04), 462–474. https://doi.org/10.4338/aci-2012-10-ra-0040
- Haleem, A., Javaid, M., Singh, R. P., & Suman, R. (2021). Telemedicine for healthcare: Capabilities, features, barriers, and applications. Sensors International, 2(2), 100–117. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8590973/
- Hamade, N., Terry, A., & Malvankar-Mehta, M. (2019). Interventions to improve the use of EMRs in primary health care: a systematic review and meta-analysis. BMJ Health & Care Informatics, 26(1), e000023. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjhci-2019-000023
- Honavar, S. G. (2020). Electronic medical records – the good, the bad and the ugly. Indian Journal of Ophthalmology, 68(3), 417–418. https://doi.org/10.4103/ijo.ijo_278_20
- Janett, R. S., & Yeracaris, P. P. (2020). Electronic Medical Records in the American Health System: Challenges and Lessons Learned. Ciência & Saúde Coletiva, 25(4), 1293–1304. https://doi.org/10.1590/1413-81232020254.28922019
- Kabukye, J. K., Koch, S., Cornet, R., Orem, J., & Hagglund, M. (2018). User Requirements for an Electronic Medical Records System for Oncology in Developing Countries: A Case Study of Uganda. AMIA Annual Symposium Proceedings, 2017, 1004. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5977730/
- Karyl Claire Derecho, Rentor Cafino, Sarah Lizette Aquino-Cafino, Isla, A., Jay Ar Esencia, Nove Joshua Lactuan, Maranda, & Clark, L. (2024). Technology adoption of electronic medical records in developing economies: A systematic review on physicians’ perspective. DIGITAL HEALTH, 10. https://doi.org/10.1177/20552076231224605
- Khattak, Z. E., El Sharu, H., & Bhutta, B. S. (2023, August 17). Overview On Ordering and Evaluation of Laboratory Tests. PubMed; StatPearls Publishing. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK570615/
- Kirilov, N. (2024). Capture of real-time data from electronic health records: scenarios and solutions. MHealth, 10(14), 14–14. https://doi.org/10.21037/mhealth-24-2
- Lougheed, T. (2019). The challenge of implementing a patient-centric EMR. Canadian Medical Association Journal, 191(5), E144–E145. https://doi.org/10.1503/cmaj.109-5706
- Ma, X. (2024). Using Electronic Medical Records (EMRs) with Chronic Diseases: Trend Analysis Towards Online and Offline Factors Associated with Patient Utilization. Emerging Media, 2(4), 636–662. https://doi.org/10.1177/27523543241300478
- Mechley, A. R. (2021). Direct Primary Care: A Successful Financial Model for the Clinical Practice of Lifestyle Medicine. American Journal of Lifestyle Medicine, 15(5), 155982762110066. https://doi.org/10.1177/15598276211006624
- Michaelsen, M. M., & Esch, T. (2023). Understanding health behavior change by motivation and reward mechanisms: a review of the literature. Understanding Health Behavior Change by Motivation and Reward Mechanisms: A Review of the Literature, 17(1). https://doi.org/10.3389/fnbeh.2023.1151918
- Ondogan, A. G., Sargin, M., & Canoz, K. (2023). Use of electronic medical records in the digital healthcare system and its role in communication and medical information sharing among healthcare professionals. Informatics in Medicine Unlocked, 42(101373), 101373. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.imu.2023.101373
- Rizer, M. K., Kaufman, B., Sieck, C. J., Hefner, J. L., & McAlearney, A. S. (2015). Top 10 Lessons Learned from Electronic Medical Record Implementation in a Large Academic Medical Center. Perspectives in Health Information Management, 12(Summer), 1g. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC4558484/
- Shaikh, M., Vayani, A. H., Akram, S., & Qamar, N. (2022). Open-source electronic health record systems: A systematic review of most recent advances. Health Informatics Journal, 28(2). https://doi.org/10.1177/14604582221099828
- Sonoo, T., Iwai, S., Inokuchi, R., Gunshin, M., Kitsuta, Y., & Nakajima, S. (2016). Embedded-structure template for electronic records affects patient note quality and management for emergency head injury patients: An observational pre and post comparison quality improvement study. Medicine, 95(40), e5105. https://doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000005105
- Upadhyay, S., & Hu, H. (2022a). A qualitative analysis of the impact of electronic health records (EHR) on healthcare quality and safety: Clinicians’ lived experiences. Health Services Insights, 15(1), 1–7. https://doi.org/10.1177/11786329211070722
- Upadhyay, S., & Hu, H. (2022b). A qualitative analysis of the impact of electronic health records (EHR) on healthcare quality and safety: Clinicians’ lived experiences. Health Services Insights, 15(1), 1–7. https://doi.org/10.1177/11786329211070722
- Zaidan, A. A., Zaidan, B. B., Hussain, M., Haiqi, A., Mat Kiah, M. L., & Abdulnabi, M. (2015). Multi-criteria analysis for OS-EMR software selection problem: A comparative study. Decision Support Systems, 78, 15–27. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dss.2015.07.002
- ZHANG, X.-Y., & ZHANG, P. (2016). Recent perspectives of electronic medical record systems. Experimental and Therapeutic Medicine, 11(6), 2083–2085. https://doi.org/10.3892/etm.2016.3233