Even for seasoned clinicians, the metabolic puzzle of chronic liver and gastrointestinal conditions can be difficult to piece together.
When standard labs and imaging fall short, the role of bile acids often goes unrecognized despite their central influence in both hepatic and systemic health.
Bile acids are no longer just digestive byproducts—they are now understood as powerful signaling molecules that influence metabolism, immunity, and the gut microbiome.
This article provides a clear, evidence-based framework for testing, interpreting, and addressing bile acid imbalances in liver and metabolic disorders.
Improve patient outcomes while growing your practice

Core Concepts in Bile Acid Biology
Bile acids are more than just emulsifiers of dietary fats. They function as dynamic signaling molecules with broad regulatory influence across the liver, gut, immune system, and metabolic pathways.
Enterohepatic circulation: The systemic axis
Bile acid physiology is anchored in the enterohepatic circulation, a highly coordinated loop of synthesis, secretion, reabsorption, and recycling. Primary bile acids are synthesized in the liver from cholesterol, conjugated with glycine or taurine for solubility, then secreted into the bile and released into the intestine during digestion.
Approximately 95% of these bile acids are reabsorbed in the terminal ileum and transported back to the liver for reuse.
Key transporters and sensors regulate this cycle. The apical sodium-dependent bile acid transporter (ASBT) mediates intestinal reabsorption, while sodium-taurocholate co-transporting polypeptide (NTCP) facilitates hepatic uptake.
Nuclear receptors like farnesoid X receptor (FXR) and membrane-bound receptors such as TGR5 sense bile acid concentrations and modulate gene expression, motility, and secretion accordingly. These mechanisms maintain systemic bile acid homeostasis and influence downstream metabolic and immune responses.
Pleiotropic functions of bile acids
Beyond digestion, bile acids participate in extensive metabolic regulation. They support lipid absorption, modulate glucose homeostasis, and influence energy expenditure through signaling cascades involving FXR and TGR5. These effects are particularly relevant in obesity, insulin resistance, and type 2 diabetes.
Bile acids also affect immune function. Through FXR and TGR5, they help modulate inflammation and gut barrier integrity, supporting mucosal immunity and maintaining the gut-liver axis.
Their interaction with the gut microbiota further shapes immune responses, influencing susceptibility to inflammatory and autoimmune conditions. Additionally, bile acids regulate hormone-like pathways, such as fibroblast growth factor 15/19 (FGF15/19), which links bile acid metabolism to circadian rhythm and nutrient sensing.
Mechanisms of dysregulation in disease
Disruptions in bile acid signaling are increasingly recognized in hepatic and metabolic disorders.
In nonalcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) and nonalcoholic steatohepatitis (NASH), altered farnesoid X receptor (FXR) signaling contributes to hepatic lipid accumulation, insulin resistance, and pro-inflammatory cytokine production. These changes exacerbate disease progression and metabolic dysfunction.
Microbial dysbiosis can further drive bile acid imbalance. In conditions like inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) and colorectal cancer (CRC), altered microbial metabolism changes bile acid composition and leads to the accumulation of pro-inflammatory or toxic species.
Pathogenic conjugation patterns and impaired detoxification result in elevated secondary bile acids, which may promote epithelial injury and carcinogenesis. Understanding these mechanisms is key to developing personalized interventions.
Diagnostic Approaches and Biomarker Integration
Incorporating bile acid testing into clinical practice requires familiarity with multiple assay types, interpretation strategies, and their relevance to disease states. Each method provides distinct insights into bile acid synthesis, circulation, and dysregulation.
Serum bile acid testing
Serum testing remains a foundational tool for evaluating bile acid status. Total bile acid measurements offer a general view of hepatic excretory function, while fractionated panels can distinguish between primary, secondary, and conjugated bile acids.
These distinctions are clinically useful in assessing conditions like cholestasis, bile acid diarrhea, or early liver dysfunction.
Interpretation requires context and nuance. Elevated fasting levels may suggest cholestasis or impaired hepatic uptake, while postprandial elevations may reflect excessive bile acid synthesis or abnormal reabsorption.
Clinical thresholds vary depending on assay type, but dynamic changes in response to meals or therapeutic interventions can reveal underlying regulatory issues.
Functional and synthesis markers
Certain biomarkers provide indirect but valuable information about bile acid metabolism. 7α-Hydroxy-4-cholesten-3-one (C4) is a surrogate marker for hepatic bile acid synthesis and is particularly informative in identifying bile acid overproduction in diarrhea-predominant disorders. Low C4 levels may indicate suppressed FXR signaling or hepatic dysfunction.
Fibroblast growth factor 19 (FGF19), an intestinal hormone induced by FXR activation, provides additional insight into gut-liver feedback. In bile acid malabsorption (BAM), reduced FGF19 alongside elevated C4 may support a diagnosis.
SeHCAT retention testing, while less widely available, remains the gold standard for assessing active BAM, offering a direct measure of ileal reabsorption efficiency.
Advanced profiling: Fecal and urinary analyses
Liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry (LC-MS/MS) platforms now allow for precise mapping of bile acid species in stool and urine. These methods can quantify individual bile acids, identify conjugation profiles, and track microbial metabolites. This level of detail helps differentiate primary synthesis issues from secondary microbial dysbiosis.
Profiling fecal bile acids can highlight malabsorption patterns or microbiome-driven changes, particularly relevant in IBS, IBD, and colorectal cancer risk. Urinary bile acid patterns, while less commonly used, may reflect hepatic overflow or detoxification capacity.
These advanced tools are increasingly valuable for clinicians aiming to tailor interventions based on specific bile acid phenotypes.
Pattern-Based Interpretation and Clinical Translation
Applying bile acid testing in clinical practice requires more than simply identifying abnormal levels. Recognizing distinct patterns and integrating them with clinical context allows for earlier detection, more accurate diagnosis, and targeted interventions.
Interpreting elevated bile acids
Elevated bile acid levels can point to a range of hepatic and gastrointestinal conditions. In intrahepatic cholestasis of pregnancy (ICP), for example, serum bile acids are often the most sensitive early marker before changes appear in liver enzymes.
Similarly, mild to moderate elevations may indicate early-stage cholestasis or impaired bile acid clearance, even in the absence of overt jaundice.
Post-surgical syndromes such as ileal resection or bariatric procedures often lead to excessive bile acid loss and subsequent hepatic overproduction. Interpreting elevations in this context can help guide therapeutic decisions, such as bile acid sequestration or dietary adjustments.
When integrated early, bile acid patterns can offer a more nuanced assessment of hepatic reserve and injury risk than traditional liver panels alone.
Profiling primary/secondary and conjugation status
The distinction between primary and secondary bile acids provides insight into both hepatic synthesis and gut microbial activity. A disproportionate rise in secondary bile acids may indicate bacterial overgrowth or altered microbial metabolism, whereas suppressed levels may suggest FXR dysfunction or impaired conversion pathways.
Conjugation status also carries diagnostic weight. Shifts in glycine-to-taurine ratios can signal hepatic stress or altered amino acid metabolism. Impaired sulfation capacity may lead to the buildup of toxic bile acid species, contributing to mucosal damage or carcinogenic processes.
Recognizing these patterns supports differentiation between metabolic, microbial, and hepatic contributors to disease.
Risk stratification and predictive use
Certain bile acid profiles are associated with elevated risk for gastrointestinal malignancies and inflammatory disorders. In colorectal cancer (CRC), increased concentrations of deoxycholic acid (DCA) and other secondary bile acids have been linked to mucosal injury and tumorigenesis. Tracking these levels may offer predictive value in high-risk populations.
In inflammatory bowel disease (IBD), bile acid signatures can help distinguish between active inflammation and functional overlap, aiding in treatment planning and monitoring. As research progresses, bile acid profiling is likely to play a growing role in surveillance and early intervention strategies, particularly when integrated with other biomarker and imaging data.
Clinical Workflow Integration and Decision Support
Effective use of bile acid testing depends not just on scientific understanding but also on practical integration into everyday clinical systems. Streamlined workflows, interdisciplinary cooperation, and decision-support tools can make these tests more actionable and accessible.
Integrating bile acid testing into clinical practice
To increase adoption, bile acid panels should be built into electronic medical record (EMR) systems as standardized order sets with optional reflex testing.
For example, panels can be set to auto-order in patients with abnormal liver function tests (LFTs), persistent diarrhea, or suspected nonalcoholic steatohepatitis (NASH). Automated alerts and flags can help identify trends or values that warrant further investigation.
Clear test triggers help guide appropriate use. These might include persistent gastrointestinal symptoms despite normal imaging, suspected bile acid diarrhea, or atypical liver enzyme patterns. Ensuring that panels include fractionated bile acids and relevant biomarkers like C4 or FGF19 supports comprehensive evaluation from a single workflow entry point.
Interdisciplinary collaboration and education
Successful implementation requires coordinated efforts across clinical specialties. Clinicians, particularly in primary care and internal medicine, benefit from structured education on interpreting bile acid results and understanding when to escalate care. Lab medicine teams can provide ongoing training on assay methodology and quality control.
Integration between gastroenterology, hepatology, and primary care supports shared protocols and faster decision-making.
For example, hepatologists can provide input on abnormal synthesis markers, while gastroenterologists may address implications of microbial dysbiosis seen in fecal bile acid profiles. This collaborative approach improves diagnostic clarity and reduces care fragmentation.
Monitoring, interpretation, and follow-up
Bile acid levels are dynamic and can shift with disease progression or therapeutic interventions. Establishing longitudinal monitoring protocols allows clinicians to track treatment response over time. This is particularly useful in conditions like NASH or bile acid diarrhea, where normalization of specific markers may correlate with symptom control or risk reduction.
Decision trees and embedded clinical algorithms can standardize follow-up. These tools help translate lab results into actionable steps, such as initiating empiric bile acid binders, ordering imaging, or referring to a specialist.
Embedding these algorithms into EMRs ensures that interpretation and response become part of the clinical routine, not a separate or overlooked task.
Targeted Therapies and Emerging Pharmacologic Frontiers
As the role of bile acids in systemic regulation becomes clearer, targeted therapies are evolving to modulate their effects with greater precision. Current and emerging interventions aim to influence bile acid signaling, transport, and composition across a wide range of hepatic and metabolic disorders.
Receptor-based modulators
Modulation of bile acid receptors has become a leading strategy in the management of liver and metabolic diseases. Farnesoid X receptor (FXR) agonists, including investigational agents like obeticholic acid, have shown promise in nonalcoholic steatohepatitis (NASH) and primary biliary cholangitis (PBC).
By activating FXR, these therapies reduce bile acid synthesis, improve insulin sensitivity, and decrease hepatic inflammation and fibrosis markers.
TGR5-targeting agents are under investigation for their anti-inflammatory and metabolic benefits. Activation of TGR5 can enhance energy expenditure, stimulate GLP-1 release, and reduce pro-inflammatory cytokines. These effects make them a compelling option for conditions characterized by metabolic dysregulation and chronic low-grade inflammation.
Sequestrants and transport inhibitors
Bile acid sequestrants remain first-line for bile acid malabsorption (BAM) and are often used to support lipid management. Agents like cholestyramine and colesevelam bind bile acids in the intestine, reducing their reabsorption and downstream effects on diarrhea or cholesterol levels.
More selective transport inhibitors, such as odevixibat and volixibat, target the apical sodium-dependent bile acid transporter (ASBT). These agents are particularly useful in pediatric cholestatic diseases and emerging indications involving bile acid-driven diarrhea.
By reducing ileal reuptake, they help limit systemic bile acid overload and improve symptom control without systemic exposure.
Replacement, rescue, and synthetic analogues
In cases of bile acid deficiency or disrupted flow, bile acid replacement therapies such as ursodeoxycholic acid (UDCA) and chenodeoxycholic acid (CDCA) can help restore physiologic balance.
UDCA is widely used in cholestatic liver disease due to its cytoprotective and choleretic properties, while CDCA may be considered in specific inherited bile acid synthesis defects.
Engineered analogues and next-generation therapies are advancing rapidly. CYP8B1 inhibitors alter bile acid composition to reduce toxicity, while fibroblast growth factor 19 (FGF19) mimetics, such as aldafermin, offer targeted regulation of synthesis with broader metabolic effects.
These novel agents reflect a precision medicine approach to bile acid disorders, tailored to individual signaling profiles and disease mechanisms.
Translational Advances and Precision Strategies
As bile acid biology becomes more deeply understood, new therapeutic strategies are emerging that harness its potential in highly targeted ways. These innovations are beginning to reshape care for gastrointestinal, hepatic, metabolic, and oncologic conditions.
Next-generation receptor therapeutics
Selective FXR modulators (SFXRMs) and non-steroidal FXR agonists are being developed to improve efficacy and reduce side effects associated with older agents. These newer compounds allow tissue-specific targeting of FXR activity, enhancing benefits in the liver and intestine while limiting systemic exposure.
Their applications are expanding beyond NASH and cholestatic diseases. In diarrhea-predominant IBS (IBS-D), FXR modulation may help regulate motility and secretion. In metabolic syndrome, these agents have shown potential to improve lipid and glucose profiles.
Emerging data also suggest roles in hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) prevention by curbing inflammation and fibrosis.
Microbiome-mediated interventions
The gut microbiome plays a direct role in shaping the bile acid pool through bacterial enzymes such as bile salt hydrolase (BSH) and 7α-dehydroxylase (bai). Targeting these pathways can shift bile acid metabolism in ways that reduce inflammation or toxic metabolite accumulation.
Therapeutic approaches include selective enzyme inhibitors, engineered probiotics, and microbiota-based treatments.
Fecal microbiota transplantation (FMT) and precision microbial consortia are under investigation to remodel bile acid pools in patients with IBD, metabolic dysfunction, or bile acid diarrhea. These strategies aim to restore beneficial bile acid-microbiome balance.
Pediatric and inherited disorders
In pediatric care, bile acid testing is essential for diagnosing rare inherited disorders such as Zellweger spectrum disorders and progressive familial intrahepatic cholestasis (PFIC). These conditions often present early in life and benefit from early intervention guided by bile acid profiling.
Newborn screening programs are beginning to include bile acid markers for early detection, while genotype-guided therapy is enabling more precise management. For example, bile acid analogues or transporter modulators can be tailored to specific genetic defects, offering improved outcomes in otherwise progressive liver diseases.
Cancer, inflammation, and prognostic value
Bile acid profiles are increasingly recognized for their diagnostic and prognostic value in inflammatory and neoplastic conditions. In colitis-associated cancer, certain bile acid species may signal early mucosal dysplasia or predict progression. Their integration into surveillance protocols could enhance early detection and personalized monitoring.
Bile acid signaling also intersects with immune regulation. This has implications for immunotherapy response in gastrointestinal and hepatic malignancies. As research evolves, bile acid profiling may help predict treatment response and identify recurrence risks.
Frequently Asked Questions (FAQs)
When should serum bile acid testing be ordered?
Serum bile acid testing is appropriate in cases of unexplained liver enzyme abnormalities, chronic diarrhea, suspected cholestasis, or metabolic liver disease.
How do FXR and TGR5 agonists differ in metabolic impact?
FXR agonists primarily regulate bile acid synthesis and hepatic metabolism, while TGR5 agonists influence energy expenditure, GLP-1 secretion, and anti-inflammatory pathways.
What bile acid profiles indicate increased cancer or inflammation risk?
Elevated levels of secondary bile acids, especially deoxycholic acid, may signal increased risk for colorectal cancer and mucosal inflammation.
Are bile acid-based treatments safe in cirrhosis?
Some bile acid therapies, such as UDCA, are used cautiously in cirrhosis, but others may require dose adjustments or be contraindicated depending on severity.
How does bile acid testing integrate with microbiome analysis?
Fecal bile acid profiling can reflect microbial enzyme activity and composition, offering a functional layer to microbiome interpretation.
Can bile acid diagnostics aid in pediatric liver disease evaluation?
Yes, they support diagnosis and monitoring of genetic cholestatic conditions and can inform early interventions in metabolic and bile acid synthesis disorders.
What’s the role of 7αC4 and SeHCAT testing in chronic diarrhea?
7αC4 helps assess bile acid overproduction, while SeHCAT quantifies ileal bile acid retention to diagnose bile acid malabsorption.
Are bile acid therapies effective in post-cholecystectomy diarrhea?
Yes, bile acid sequestrants are often effective by binding excess bile acids that enter the colon due to altered post-surgical flow.
What are the implications of conjugation patterns in genetic syndromes?
Abnormal glycine or taurine conjugation may indicate enzymatic defects or transporter mutations seen in inherited bile acid disorders.
How should clinicians interpret discordant serum and fecal bile acid patterns?
Discordance may reflect isolated hepatic vs. intestinal dysfunction or suggest complex interplay. Bile acids play a central regulatory role beyond digestion, influencing metabolism, immunity, and the gut microbiome through complex signaling pathways like FXR and TGR5.
Key Takeaways
- Bile acids play a central regulatory role beyond digestion, influencing metabolism, immunity, and the gut microbiome through complex signaling pathways like FXR and TGR5.
- Disruptions in bile acid metabolism contribute to liver and metabolic diseases such as NAFLD, NASH, IBD, and colorectal cancer by promoting inflammation, microbial imbalance, and toxic metabolite buildup.
- Clinical testing, including serum, fecal, and urinary bile acid panels, can reveal distinct patterns tied to liver function, intestinal absorption, and microbial activity, aiding in diagnosis and personalized treatment.
- New therapies target bile acid receptors, transporters, and synthesis pathways to treat conditions like NASH, bile acid diarrhea, and inherited liver diseases with increasing precision.
- Integrating bile acid profiling into routine care, via EMR-based workflows, interdisciplinary collaboration, and longitudinal monitoring, enables early detection, tailored interventions, and improved outcomes in complex liver and GI disorders.
Disclaimer:
This article is intended for educational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Clinicians should rely on their professional judgment, current clinical guidelines, and individual patient needs when applying the information presented.
Improve patient outcomes while growing your practice

References
- Ahmad, A., Mahmood, N., Raza, M. A., Mushtaq, Z., Saeed, F., Muhammad Afzaal, Hussain, M., Amjad, H. W., & Hashim Mohammad Al-Awadi. (2024). Gut microbiota and their derivatives in the progression of colorectal cancer: Mechanisms of action, genome and epigenome contributions. Heliyon, 10(8), e29495–e29495. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e29495
- Albaugh, V. L., Babak Banan, Ajouz, H., Abumrad, N. N., & Flynn, C. R. (2017). Bile acids and bariatric surgery. Molecular Aspects of Medicine, 56, 75–89. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mam.2017.04.001
- Alberto González-Regueiro, J., Moreno-Castañeda, L., Uribe, M., & Carlos Chávez-Tapia, N. (2017). The Role of Bile Acids in Glucose Metabolism and Their Relation with Diabetes. Annals of Hepatology, 16, S15–S20. https://doi.org/10.5604/01.3001.0010.5494
- Almajid, A. N., & Sugumar, K. (2019, June 4). Physiology, Bile. Nih.gov; StatPearls Publishing. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK542254/
- Appleby, R. N., Moghul, I., Khan, S., Yee, M., Manousou, P., Neal, T. D., & Walters, J. R. F. (2019). Non-alcoholic fatty liver disease is associated with dysregulated bile acid synthesis and diarrhea: A prospective observational study. PLOS ONE, 14(1), e0211348. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0211348
- Bertolini, A., Fiorotto, R., & Strazzabosco, M. (2022). Bile acids and their receptors: modulators and therapeutic targets in liver inflammation. Seminars in Immunopathology. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00281-022-00935-7
- Bustamante, J.-M., Dawson, T., Loeffler, C., Marfori, Z., Marchesi, J. R., Mullish, B. H., Thompson, C. C., Crandall, K. A., Rahnavard, A., Allegretti, J. R., & Cummings, B. P. (2022). Impact of Fecal Microbiota Transplantation on Gut Bacterial Bile Acid Metabolism in Humans. Nutrients, 14(24), 5200. https://doi.org/10.3390/nu14245200
- Cai, J., Sun, L., & Gonzalez, F. J. (2022). Gut microbiota-derived bile acids in intestinal immunity, inflammation, and tumorigenesis. Cell Host & Microbe, 30(3), 289–300. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chom.2022.02.004
- Chiang, J. Y. L. (2017). Bile acid metabolism and signaling in liver disease and therapy. Liver Research, 1(1), 3–9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.livres.2017.05.001
- Chiang, J. Y. L., & Ferrell, J. M. (2020). Bile acid receptors FXR and TGR5 signaling in fatty liver diseases and therapy. American Journal of Physiology-Gastrointestinal and Liver Physiology, 318(3), G554–G573. https://doi.org/10.1152/ajpgi.00223.2019
- Dewaele, D., Annaert, P., & Hoeben, E. (2019). LC-MS/MS Analysis of Bile Acids in In Vitro Samples. Methods in Molecular Biology (Clifton, N.J.), 1981, 15–23. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4939-9420-5_2
- Durník, R., Šindlerová, L., Babica, P., & Jurček, O. (2022). Bile Acids Transporters of Enterohepatic Circulation for Targeted Drug Delivery. Molecules, 27(9), 2961. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules27092961
- Fani, B., Bertani, L., Paglianiti, I., Fantechi, L., De Bortoli, N., Costa, F., Volterrani, D., Marchi, S., & Bellini, M. (2018). Pros and Cons of the SeHCAT Test in Bile Acid Diarrhea: A More Appropriate Use of an Old Nuclear Medicine Technique. Gastroenterology Research and Practice, 2018, 1–9. https://doi.org/10.1155/2018/2097359
- Fiorucci, S., Carino, A., Baldoni, M., Santucci, L., Costanzi, E., Graziosi, L., Distrutti, E., & Biagioli, M. (2020). Bile Acid Signaling in Inflammatory Bowel Diseases. Digestive Diseases and Sciences, 66(3), 674–693. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10620-020-06715-3
- Fiorucci, S., Marchianò, S., Distrutti, E., & Biagioli, M. (2025). Bile acids and their receptors in hepatic immunity. Liver Research. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.livres.2025.01.005
- Fogelson, K. A., Dorrestein, P. C., Amir Zarrinpar, & Knight, R. (2023). The Gut Microbial Bile Acid Modulation and Its Relevance to Digestive Health and Diseases. 164(7), 1069–1085. https://doi.org/10.1053/j.gastro.2023.02.022
- Gadaleta, R. M., & Moschetta, A. (2019). Metabolic Messengers: fibroblast growth factor 15/19. Nature Metabolism, 1(6), 588–594. https://doi.org/10.1038/s42255-019-0074-3
- Garbutt, J. T., Heaton, K. W., Lack, L., & Tyor, M. P. (2019). Increased Ratio of Glycine- to Taurine-Conjugated Bile Salts in Patients with Ileal Disorders. Gastroenterology, 56(4), 711–720. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0016-5085(69)80032-6
- Harrison, S. A., Neff, G., Guy, C. D., Bashir, M. R., Paredes, A. H., Frias, J. P., Younes, Z., Trotter, J. F., Gunn, N. T., Moussa, S. E., Kohli, A., Nelson, K., Gottwald, M., Chang, W. C. G., Yan, A. Z., DePaoli, A. M., Ling, L., & Lieu, H. D. (2021). Efficacy and Safety of Aldafermin, an Engineered FGF19 Analog, in a Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled Trial of Patients With Nonalcoholic Steatohepatitis. Gastroenterology, 160(1), 219-231.e1. https://doi.org/10.1053/j.gastro.2020.08.004
- He, Y., Shaoyong, W., Chen, Y., Li, M., Gan, Y., Sun, L., Liu, Y., Wang, Y., & Jin, M. (2025). The functions of gut microbiota-mediated bile acid metabolism in intestinal immunity. Journal of Advanced Research. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jare.2025.05.015
- Honavar, S. G. (2020). Electronic medical records – the good, the bad and the ugly. Indian Journal of Ophthalmology, 68(3), 417–418. https://doi.org/10.4103/ijo.ijo_278_20
- Hundt, M., Basit, H., & John, S. (2022). Physiology, Bile Secretion. Nih.gov; StatPearls Publishing. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK470209/
- Lent-Schochet, D., & Jialal, I. (2021). Antilipemic Agent Bile Acid Sequestrants. PubMed; StatPearls Publishing. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK549906/
- Liu, Y., Zhang, S., Zhou, W., Hu, D., Xu, H., & Ji, G. (2022). Secondary Bile Acids and Tumorigenesis in Colorectal Cancer. Frontiers in Oncology, 12. https://doi.org/10.3389/fonc.2022.813745
- Manzotti, C., Casazza, G., Stimac, T., Nikolova, D., & Gluud, C. (2019). Total serum bile acids or serum bile acid profile, or both, for the diagnosis of intrahepatic cholestasis of pregnancy. The Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, 7, CD012546. https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD012546.pub2
- Mobina Kouhzad, Friedrich Götz, Tahereh Navidifar, Taki, E., Mahsa Ghamari, Roghayeh Mohammadzadeh, Seyedolmohadesin, M., & Narjess Bostanghadiri. (2025). Carcinogenic and anticancer activities of microbiota-derived secondary bile acids. Frontiers in Oncology, 15. https://doi.org/10.3389/fonc.2025.1514872
- Newsome, P. N., Palmer, M., Freilich, B., Sheikh, M. Y., Sheikh, A., Sarles, H., Herring, R., Parvez Mantry, Kayali, Z., Hassanein, T., Lee, H.-M., & Aithal, G. P. (2020). Volixibat in adults with non-alcoholic steatohepatitis: 24-week interim analysis from a randomized, phase II study. Journal of Hepatology, 73(2), 231–240. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhep.2020.03.024
- Ocvirk, S., & O’Keefe, S. J. (2017). Influence of Bile Acids on Colorectal Cancer Risk: Potential Mechanisms Mediated by Diet-Gut Microbiota Interactions. Current Nutrition Reports, 6(4), 315–322. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13668-017-0219-5
- Panzitt, K., Zollner, G., Marschall, H.-U., & Wagner, M. (2022). Recent advances on FXR-targeting therapeutics. Molecular and Cellular Endocrinology, 552, 111678. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mce.2022.111678
- Pellé, K. G., Rambaud-Althaus, C., D’Acremont, V., Moran, G., Sampath, R., Katz, Z., Moussy, F. G., Mehl, G. L., & Dittrich, S. (2020). Electronic clinical decision support algorithms incorporating point-of-care diagnostic tests in low-resource settings: a target product profile. BMJ Global Health, 5(2), e002067. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjgh-2019-002067
- Shao, J.-W., Ge, T.-T., Chen, S.-Z., Wang, G., Yang, Q., Huang, C.-H., Xu, L.-C., & Chen, Z. (2021). Role of bile acids in liver diseases mediated by the gut microbiome. World Journal of Gastroenterology, 27(22), 3010–3021. https://doi.org/10.3748/wjg.v27.i22.3010
- Siddiqi, I., & Tadi, P. (2023). Progressive Familial Intrahepatic Cholestasis. PubMed; StatPearls Publishing. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK559317/
- Tang, X., Ning, J., Zhao, Y., Feng, S., Shao, L., Liu, T., Miao, H., Zhang, Y., & Wang, C. (2024). Intestine-derived fibroblast growth factor 19 alleviates lipopolysaccharide-induced liver injury by regulating bile acid homeostasis and directly improving oxidative stress. Journal of Intensive Medicine, 5(1), 79–88. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jointm.2024.06.003
- Tatjana Milivojac, Milkica Grabež, Ljiljana Amidžić, Prtina, A., Aleksandra Krivokuća, Ugljesa Malicevic, Maja Barudžija, Milka Matičić, Snežana Uletilović, Nebojša Mandić-Kovačević, Cvjetković, T., Stojiljković, M. P., Milica Gajić Bojić, Momir Mikov, Radoslav Gajanin, Sergey Bolevich, Aleksandar Petrović, & Ranko Škrbić. (2025). Ursodeoxycholic and chenodeoxycholic bile acids alleviate endotoxininduced acute lung injury in rats by modulating aquaporin expression and pathways associated with apoptosis and inflammation. Frontiers in Pharmacology, 16. https://doi.org/10.3389/fphar.2025.1484292
- Ticho, A. L., Malhotra, P., Dudeja, P. K., Gill, R. K., & Alrefai, W. A. (2019). Bile acid receptors and gastrointestinal functions. Liver Research, 3(1), 31–39. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.livres.2019.01.001
- Xi, Y., & Li, H. (2020). Role of farnesoid X receptor in hepatic steatosis in nonalcoholic fatty liver disease. Biomedicine & Pharmacotherapy, 121, 109609. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biopha.2019.109609
- Yin, C., Zhong, R., Zhang, W., Liu, L., Chen, L., & Zhang, H. (2023). The Potential of Bile Acids as Biomarkers for Metabolic Disorders. International Journal of Molecular Sciences, 24(15), 12123–12123. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms241512123
- Zhao, X., Zheng, I., Huang, W., Tang, D., Zhao, M., Hou, R., Huang, Y., Shi, Y., Zhu, W., & Wang, S. (2025). Research Progress on the Mechanism of Bile Acids and Their Receptors in Depression. International Journal of Molecular Sciences, 26(9), 4023–4023. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms26094023
- Zhuang, T., Wang, X., Wang, Z., Gu, L., Yue, D., Wang, Z., Li, X., Yang, L., Huang, W., & Ding, L. (2024). Biological functions and pharmacological behaviors of bile acids in metabolic diseases. Journal of Advanced Research. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jare.2024.11.003